Here's more documentation filed before the Texas Supreme Court on the State's request for the 3rd Circuit's decision to be stayed - or not enforced - pending the Supreme Court's determination of the mandamus request:
Reply to Response to Motion for Request for Emergency Relief with an Appendix (filed by the State, countering the arguments made by the FLDS mothers that there is no need for a stay)
Sur-Reply to Reply to Response to Motion for Request for Emergency Relief (filed by the FLDS Mothers, responding to the arguments made in the State's reply to their initial filing).
Notice how the following phrase repeats itself throughout the State's Appendix: "habeas petition was not averred by relator, only relator's attorney who had no personal knowledge of maternity."
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
